Next: Comparison of two schemes
Up: Numerical Implementations
Previous: Pseudospectral scheme
Contents
For every time step, the TTI pure P-wave computation in equation 4.10
requires two forward FFTs and twelve inverse FFTs,
which are computationally intensive. By revisiting equation 4.9,
I find that due to the appearance of the wavenumbers in the denominators,
equation 4.9c must be evaluated using the pseudospectral method and
it would be difficult to derive pure finite-difference operators that correspond to
the six right-hand-side terms.
However, there are no such terms in equations 4.9a and 4.9b.
To greatly reduce the computation time while avoiding spurious shear-wave artifacts as well as numerical instabilities, I propose a hybrid pseudospectral/finite-difference scheme to evaluate the
TTI pure P-wave equation in equation 4.10.
That is, transforming equations 4.9a and 4.9b using the relations
,
,
yields
where
and
can be approximated by finite-difference operators
applied along the symmetry axis and symmetry plane, respectively.
Spatial derivatives in the above equation can be cheaply computed using a second, fourth or higher order finite-difference
scheme instead of using FFTs back and forth.
Although wavenumber terms in equation 4.9c can not all be replaced by corresponding
finite-difference operators, it could be partially approximated as follows
Notice that the number of wavenumber terms in equation 4.11c is reduced from six to three. And
can now be approximated by finite-difference operators as well as
and
.
Therefore, the resulting hybrid solution to the TTI pure P-wave equation becomes
|
(412) |
Noticeably, this new proposed hybrid strategy only requires four
(one forward and three inverse) 3D FFTs per time step in simulating
a pure P-wave propagation in a 3D TTI medium. For a 2D model,
the number of FFTs reduces to three per time step
in the hybrid method.
Next: Comparison of two schemes
Up: Numerical Implementations
Previous: Pseudospectral scheme
Contents
Ge Zhan
2013-07-09