next up previous contents
Next: Numerical results Up: Theory Previous: Least-squares Migration   Contents

Plane-wave prestack LSRTM

In Dai et al. (2012), the multisource technique is implemented with random time shifts and random source polarity encoding functions to greatly reduce the computational cost. By stacking images from different supergathers and gradients from different iterations, the coherent signal is enhanced while the crosstalk noise is reduced. In this report, the shot-domain data are encoded with linear time-shift encoding functions and transformed into plane waves. Assuming a 2D survey geometry, the encoding process can be expressed as:

$\displaystyle d(x_g,t;p) = \sum_{x_s} d(x_g,t;x_s) * \delta(t-p\cdot x_s),$ (35)

where the shot-domain data $ d(x_g,t;x_s)$ are encoded with a time shift function $ \delta(t-p\cdot x_s)$ and stacked together. As illustrated by Figure [*], the time shift $ p\cdot x_s$ is a linear function of source position $ x_s$ , and $ p$ is the ray parameter defined as

$\displaystyle p=\frac{sin\theta}{v},$ (36)

where $ \theta$ is the surface shooting angle and $ v$ is the velocity at the surface. For the 3D case, the plane-wave is computed from linear combination of surface sources along the $ x$ -direction or both the $ x$ - and $ y$ -directions to form planar sources (see Zhang et al. (2005) and Duquet Lailly (2006) for details). Since the plane waves are coherent signals, the migration image of one plane wave does not contain crosstalk noise seen in the migration image of a phase-encoded supergather. Instead, it contains aliasing artifacts, which can be reduced by stacking images from many different angles. Zhang et al. (2005) provided an estimate of how many angles are needed as a function of recording aperture, velocity model, and estimated dipping angle range of the reflectors.

Figure: The diagram of plane wave encoding (reproduced from Zhang et al. (2005)), where the time shift is linear function to the source location $ x$ and the slope is the ray parameter $ p$ .
\includegraphics[width=4.0in]{./chap3.plane.img/plane_shoot.eps}

In the plane-wave domain, the prestack image ensemble is a function of the ray parameter

$\displaystyle \underline{\mathfrak{m}}\rightarrow\underline{\mathfrak{m}}(\textbf{x},p),$ (37)

or in matrix-vector notation

$\displaystyle \underline{\mathfrak{m}}=
 \begin{bmatrix}
 \textbf{m}_1\\ 
 \textbf{m}_2\\ 
 \cdot\\ 
 \textbf{m}_{N_p}
 \end{bmatrix},$ (38)

assuming there are $ N_p$ plane-wave gathers. In above equation, $ \textbf{m}_i$ is the image associated with the $ ith$ plane-wave gather. A new misfit functional is defined in the plane-wave domain as
$\displaystyle f(\underline{\mathfrak{m}})$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum^{N_p}_{i=1}\vert\vert\textbf{L}_i\textbf{m}_i-\te...
...{2} + \frac{\gamma}{2}\vert\vert\textbf{C}\underline{\mathfrak{m}}\vert\vert^2,$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\vert\vert\underline{\mathfrak{Lm}}-\textbf{d}\vert\vert^{2} + \frac{\gamma}{2}\vert\vert\textbf{C}\underline{\mathfrak{m}}\vert\vert^2,$ (39)

Note that $ \textbf{d}_i$ represents the $ ith$ plane-wave gather and $ \textbf{L}_i$ is the forward modeling operator associated with it. In this chapter, I choose a regularization term that penalizes the difference of migration images computed with slightly different incidence angles, and it is defined as

$\displaystyle \vert\vert\textbf{C}\underline{\mathfrak{m}}\vert\vert^2=\sum^{N_p-1}_{i=1}\vert\vert\textbf{m}_{i+1}-\textbf{m}_i\vert\vert^2$ (40)

$ \gamma$ is the damping coefficient and is chosen empirically. Then a preconditioned conjugate gradient scheme similar to equation [*] can be implemented:
$\displaystyle \textbf{g}^{(k+1)}$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \underline{\mathfrak{L}}^{T}[\underline{\mathfrak{Lm}}^{(k)}-\textbf{d}]+\gamma \textbf{C}^T\textbf{C}\underline{\mathfrak{m}}^{(k)}$  
$\displaystyle \beta$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{\textbf{g}^{(k+1)}\textbf{Pg}^{(k+1)}}{\textbf{g}^{(k)}\textbf{Pg}^{(k)}}$  
$\displaystyle \textbf{z}^{(k+1)}$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \textbf{Pg}^{(k+1)}+\beta \textbf{z}^{(k)}$  
$\displaystyle \alpha$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{[\textbf{z}^{(k+1)}]^{T}\textbf{g}^{(k+1)}}{[\textbf{Lz}^{(k+1)}]^{T}\textbf{Lz}^{(k+1)}+\lambda \vert\vert\textbf{Cz}^{(k+1)}\vert\vert^2}$  
$\displaystyle \underline{\mathfrak{m}}^{(k+1)}$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \underline{\mathfrak{m}}^{(k)}-\alpha \textbf{z}^{(k+1)},$ (41)

to find the LSRTM prestack images. In the next section, unless otherwise denoted, all LSRTM images are produced with the proposed new method.


next up previous contents
Next: Numerical results Up: Theory Previous: Least-squares Migration   Contents
Wei Dai 2013-07-10